Peer Review Policy
IIARD Journals is committed to maintaining the integrity and quality of the scholarly publishing process through a robust peer review system. All submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure academic standards and originality.
Review Process:
- Each manuscript is first screened by the editorial board for scope, formatting, and plagiarism.
- Suitable papers are then assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the subject area.
- Reviewers remain anonymous to the authors, and vice versa, to maintain objectivity (double-blind).
Reviewer Responsibilities:
- Evaluate the paper’s originality, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field.
- Provide constructive feedback and suggest improvements or revisions.
- Submit their review within the allocated time frame.
Editorial Decision:
- Based on the reviewers' feedback, the editor will make one of the following decisions: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
IIARD reserves the right to reject a manuscript at any stage if ethical concerns, plagiarism, or significant quality issues arise.