Nature, Frequency, and Delivery Consistency of Government Input Subsidies Among Rice Farmers in Ogoja Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria

Ayim; Emmanuel Edi; Ochoche C. Abua; Jimmy; U.J

doi:10.56201/ijgem.vol.12.no10.2026.pg455.464

📄 Download Paper

Nature, Frequency, and Delivery Consistency of Government Input Subsidies Among Rice Farmers in Ogoja Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria

Ayim, Emmanuel Edi, Ochoche C. Abua, Jimmy, U.J

Abstract

Input subsidies remain the most widely deployed policy instrument for stimulating smallholder rice productivity across sub-Saharan Africa, yet evidence on how such subsidies are actually distributed, timed, and perceived at the point of delivery remains scarce for many rice- producing localities. This study characterises the nature, frequency, and delivery consistency of government-backed rice input subsidies among smallholder farmers in Ogoja Local Government Area , Cross River State, Nigeria. Using a cross-sectional survey design, primary data were collected from 148 respondents (120 farmers, 20 processors/millers, and 10 marketers) drawn from three rice-producing clans-Ekajuk, Nkim, and Ibil-through a three- stage sampling procedure. Descriptive and percentage analyses were applied to five subsidy- related constructs: type of input received, source of subsidy, recency/timing, consistency of receipt, and perceived quality/adequacy. Only 16.9% of respondents reported receiving any form of subsidy in the reference period, and among these, fertiliser dominated the input mix (49.3% of inputs distributed), while non-governmental organisations, rather than federal or state agencies, were the leading source of support (50.7%). A composite assessment across the four delivery dimensions produced a mean score of 2.13 on a 4-point scale, with timing of delivery rated lowest (17.6%) and source of subsidy rated highest (31.5%), indicating a persistent implementation lag consistent with patterns documented across Malawi, Zambia, and other African input-subsidy programmes. The findings suggest that Nigeria's e-wallet- based 'smart subsidy' architecture, exemplified by the National Agricultural Growth Scheme- Agro-Pocket (NAGS-AP), has not yet translated into predictable, season-aligned input delivery at the community level. The study recommends synchronising disbursement calendars with the agronomic calendar, diversifying delivery channels beyond ad hoc NGO interventions, and IJGEM IJGEM IIARD International Journal of Geography & Environmental Management strengthening last-mile logistics to close the gap between subsidy announcement and subsidy receipt.

Keywords

input subsidy; delivery timing; smart subsidy; NAGS-AP; smallholder rice farmers; sub-Saharan Africa

References

Ahmed, U., & Bello, A. (2025). Smart subsidy delivery and last-mile logistics in Nigeria's fertiliser value chain. Journal of Agricultural Systems and Development, 12(1), 45-61. Akoun, E. B., Ita, U. E., & Bassey, N. E. (2021). Profitability analysis of rice production in Ogoja Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11(2), 88-99. Diagne, A. (2006). Diffusion and adoption of NERICA rice varieties in Côte d'Ivoire. The Developing Economies, 44(2), 208-231. Dorward, A., & Chirwa, E. (2011). The Malawi Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9(1), 232-247. European Commission. (2022). The Common Agricultural Policy: 2023-27. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. Fan, S., Gulati, A., & Thorat, S. (2008). Investment, subsidies, and pro-poor growth in rural India. Agricultural Economics, 39(2), 163-170. Food and Agriculture Organization . (2021). The State of Food and Agriculture 2021. Rome: FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization . (2024). Rice Market Monitor, Volume XXVII. Rome: FAO. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security . (2024). National Agricultural Growth Scheme-Agro-Pocket (NAGS-AP) implementation guidelines. Abuja: FMAFS. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. (2023). Input subsidy dependency and environmental sustainability in Indian agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1-14. Jayne, T. S., Mather, D., & Mghenyi, E. (2010). Principal challenges confronting smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 38(10), 1384-1398. Jayne, T. S., & Rashid, S. (2013). Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: A synthesis of recent evidence. Agricultural Economics, 44(6), 547-562. Mason, N. M., & Ricker-Gilbert, J. (2013). Disrupting demand for commercial seed: Input subsidies in Malawi and Zambia. World Development, 45, 75-91. Minot, N., & Benson, T. (2009). Fertilizer subsidies in Africa: Are vouchers the answer? IFPRI Issue Brief 60. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. National Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services . (2022). Agricultural performance survey report. Zaria: Ahmadu Bello University. News Central. (2024, November). Tractor hiring bottlenecks stall Nigeria's dry-season farming push. News Central Africa. Olawunmi, F. A., Adeyemi, T. O., & Bassey, U. E. (2025). Implementation lag in Nigeria's agricultural subsidy schemes: Regional evidence. West African Journal of Agricultural Policy, 8(1), 22-40. Otsuka, K., & Larson, D. F. (Eds.). (2013). An African Green Revolution: Finding Ways to Boost Productivity on Small Farms. Dordrecht: Springer. Punch. (2025, February). Farmers decry delayed input distribution as planting season begins. Punch Newspapers. Ricker-Gilbert, J., Jayne, T. S., & Chirwa, E. (2011). Subsidies and crowding out: A double- hurdle model of fertilizer demand in Malawi. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(1), 26-42. Rosegrant, M. W., Ringler, C., & Zhu, T. (2013). Water for agriculture: Maintaining food security under growing scarcity. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 205-222. World Bank. (2024). Nigeria agriculture sector performance review. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. IJGEM IJGEM IIARD International Journal of Geography & Environmental Management World Economic Forum. (2025). Global rice demand and food security outlook to 2035. Geneva: WEF.

Nature, Frequency, and Delivery Consistency of Government Input Subsidies Among Rice Farmers in Ogoja Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria

Abstract

Keywords

References

More Articles from IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT