Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Learning Chemistry with Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Phenomenological Study of Secondary School Students’ Experiences in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Amangele Iyenemi Crystal PHD

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence offers new opportunities for supporting Chemistry learning, but accessible explanations may not translate into independent conceptual understanding. This paper examined experiences of understanding Chemistry concepts, perceptions of usefulness and challenges associated with generative artificial intelligence within a secondary school context in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. A qualitative analysis informed by an interpretative phenomenological approach was undertaken using ten participants. Analysis involved examining individual accounts, identifying experiential meanings and comparing patterns across cases. The accounts portrayed conceptual understanding as developing through manageable explanations, recognition of errors, comparison with other resources, and independent practice. However, apparent clarity sometimes coexisted with difficulties applying knowledge to unfamiliar problems. Perceived usefulness centred on repeated clarification without embarrassment, support outside classroom instruction, revision activities and alternative explanations. Challenges included shared devices, data costs, unreliable connectivity, unfamiliar terminology, uncertainty about response accuracy, difficulty formulating questions and the temptation to copy solutions. The analysis suggests that generative artificial intelligence may serve as a supplementary resource when combined with teacher guidance, textbooks, practical demonstrations, and independent problem-solving.

Keywords

generative artificial intelligenceChemistry learningsecondary school studentsphenomenologyBayelsa State

References

Ardyansyah, A., Yuwono, A. B., Rahayu, S., Alsulami, N. M., & Sulistina, O. (2024). Students’ perspectives on the application of a generative pre-trained transformer in chemistry learning: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(9), 3666–3675. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00220 Clark, M. J., Reynders, M., & Holme, T. A. (2024). Students’ experience of a ChatGPT enabled final exam in a non-majors chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1983–1991. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00161 Clark, T. M. (2023). Investigating the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot with general chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), 1905–1916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00027 Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535 Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child (D. Coltman, Trans.). Orion Press. catalog.library.tamu.edu Tyson, J. (2023). Shortcomings of ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 3098– 3101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00361 Valeri, F., Nilsson, P., & Cederqvist, A.-M. (2025). Exploring students’ experience of ChatGPT in STEM education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100360 hh.diva-portal.org