Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Economic Diplomacy in Nigeria’s Foreign Policy: Implementation and Outcomes

Jonathan, Jennifer Marke

Abstract

This study seeks to assess the economic diplomacy in Nigeria’s foreign policy development and its implementation and outcomes. The study considered various layers of Nigeria’s global partnerships aimed at advocacy that will direct the commercial interest of the country to pursue economic growth. Contemporary studies were analyzed to determine their findings and recommendations which form the basis for the methodology adopted. A mixed-methods design that integrates quantitative analysis of macroeconomic indicators with qualitative semi-structured interviews to examine the efficacy of Nigeria’s economic statecraft is deployed for the study. The primary source of evidence is archival government reports and open-ended interviews with diverse stakeholders, including academic experts, diplomatic officials, and media representatives. The outcomes of foreign policy outcomes are measured by evaluating shifts in intra-African trade volumes and foreign direct investment inflows, utilizing a dual-metric approach that captures both qualitative perceptions of diplomatic efficacy and quantitative economic growth indicators. Findings indicates that Nigeria’s strategic engagement is complicated by its dual-track foreign policy, which simultaneously pursues traditional Western partnerships while exploring the economic potential of emerging BRICS-led initiatives. Contrary to desired favorable outcomes, policy somersault has resulted in Nigeria’s strained bilateral relations with South Africa and others in its cohort, where a lack of formalized institutional structures has often led to personality- driven diplomacy that remains vulnerable to cyclical political shifts. A key recommendation of this study is that, Nigeria transitions toward a more integrated, evidence-based foreign policy that harmonizes domestic economic reform with its regional leadership ambitions. Prioritizing the modernization of diplomatic infrastructure and the professionalization of its foreign service which is essential to bridge the current implementation gap and restore institutional continuity. Key Words: Economic Diplomacy, Foreign Policy, Implementation, Nigeria

Keywords

Economic DiplomacyForeign PolicyImplementationNigeria

References

Abubakar, F. (2025). Diplomatic Relations between Nigeria and South Africa in Perspectives: The Pros and Cons since 1999. KWARARAFA Security Review, 3(3), 110– 128. https://doi.org/10.64633/ksr.v3.i3.10 Adams, E. J., & Okoliko, M. G. (2024). The domestic-foreign policy nexus and electoral dynamics in Nigeria: A global perspective. Kampala International University Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 243– 259. https://doi.org/10.59568/kijhus-2024-5-2-17 Adedotun, O., & Musa, U. (2003). Comparative Economic Blocs in African Regional Governance: A Study of Nigeria. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18780309 Adesimbo, T. A., Lourenço, J. A., & Lehfeld, N. A. D. S. (2026). International Collaboration in the Global South: Evidence and Implications from the Nigerian Context. International Journal of Advanced Research, 14(1), 1434–1444. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/22679 Ahmed, F., & Najimu, B. K. (2025). Impact Assessment of Nigeria’s Afrocentric Foreign Policy on Peace and Security in West Africa. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i7n16 Akbal, Ö. (2026). The Relationship between the Western Balkan and Gulf Cooperation Council States: An Intersubjective and Systemic Discussion. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 17(50), 604– 621. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1680304 Arslan, S. (2025). The Strategic and Geopolitical Analysis of the Impact of Economic Power on Foreign Policy. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(11), 85– 123. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i11.3011 Bamidele, S., & James, O. (2017). The Struggle for Hegemony in Africa: Nigeria and South Africa Relations in Perspectives, 1999-2014. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 11(3), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpsir2016.0899 Blessing, E. C. (2026). A Strategic Analysis of Nigeria’s Hedging Strategy in the Context of U.S.-China Rivalry. Open Journal of Business and Management, 14(2), 884– 900. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2026.142051 Boge, F. I., & Olawoyin, H. O. (2026). Nigeria-Japan Economic Relations, 1999–2023. Journal of Contemporary International Relations and Diplomacy, 6(2), 112– 128. https://doi.org/10.53982/jcird.2025.0602.08-j Bratosin-Vasilache, C. (2025). Exploring Economic Diplomacy through Qualitative Research Methods. The Romanian Economic Journal, 90. https://doi.org/10.24818/rej/2025/90/08 Byiers, B., & Woolfrey, S. (2022). Nigeria and the AfCFTA as a two‐level game. World Economy, 46(2), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13357 Chukwudozie, C. D. (2025). China’s Presence in Nigeria 2000-2025: Trade, Infrastructure Development, Diplomatic Relationship, and Its Impacts. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(11), 3161– 3171. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.91100252 Csabay, M., & Cséfalvayová, K. (2022). Reconciling Institutional Actors of Economic Diplomacy. Mezinárodní Vztahy, 57(2), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.32422/cjir.2 Erondu, A. J., Ibeakuzie, G. O., Ekwuluo, C. E., Obohwemu, K. O., Olori, F. E., Ituah, F., Chukwu, J. A., & Onuoha, C. W. (2026). Continuity and Change in Nigeria’s Foreign Policy: A JLGP JLGP E-ISSN 2579-051X Multi-Era Analysis from Military Rule to Democratic Governance. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 6(3), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-06-03-01 Fouquet, S., Baydag, R. M., Brummer, K., Schirm, S. A., Oktay, S., Moro, F. N., Moschella, M., Thies, C. G., & Wehner, L. (2026). Dialogue instead of mutual neglect? International political economy meets foreign policy analysis. Cooperation and