Submit your papersSubmit Now
For Enquiries: [email protected]
IIARD LogoIIARD

Factors Influencing Sustainable Public Procurement Management in Bauchi State, Nigeria

Zainab Ibraheem Harun1, Abdullahi Nafiu Zadawa1, Prof. Alhasan Dahiru, Ogunsanya Raphael1

Abstract

Purpose – Sustainable public procurement is widely promoted as a lever for meeting development goals, yet its uptake among sub-national public institutions in Nigeria remains limited and is poorly documented at the level of specific enabling factors. This study examines how four factors identified by the Bauchi State Bureau of Public Procurement (risk evaluation, technology, procurement training, and transparent procurement rules) are perceived to influence sustainable public procurement management. Design/methodology/approach – A cross-sectional descriptive survey was administered to procurement personnel drawn from three public institutions responsible for procurement in Bauchi State: the Bureau of Public Procurement, the Public Service Commission, and the Ministry of Finance. From a population of 180 staff, a sample of 123 was determined using Krejcie and Morgan's (1970) table; 119 usable structured questionnaires (96.7% response rate) were analysed using descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations and rank ordering). Findings – Economic efficiency (cost-effectiveness while meeting sustainability goals) was the most highly rated risk-evaluation consideration; digital procurement platforms and e- procurement systems were the most valued technological enabler; enhancement of staff knowledge of sustainable-procurement principles was the most valued training outcome; and reduced corruption with enhanced accountability was the most valued benefit attributed to transparent procurement rules. Practical implications – The findings support targeted investment in e-procurement and digital infrastructure, mandatory sustainability-focused training and certification for procurement personnel, and stronger enforcement of transparent procurement rules as practical levers for advancing sustainable procurement in Nigerian sub-national government. Originality/value – The study offers one of the first factor-level, empirically grounded accounts of sustainable procurement enablers within a Nigerian state-level procurement bureaucracy, situating Triple Bottom Line, Technology Acceptance, and Technology–Organization– Environment perspectives within an under-researched sub-national public-sector setting.

Keywords

Sustainable procurement; public procurement; e-procurement; risk evaluation; procurement training; transparency; Nigeria; Bauchi State jpaswr

References

Adham, K. N., & Siwar, C. (2012). Empirical investigation of government green procurement practices in Malaysia. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(4), 77–88. Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., & Wood, G. (2019). Global supply chain and manufacturing innovation: The role of emerging economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 196–206. Appolloni, A., Sun, H., Jia, F., & Li, X. (2014). Green procurement in the private sector: A state of the art review between 1996 and 2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 122– 133. Bauchi State Bureau of Public Procurement. (2020). Annual procurement performance report. Bauchi State Government. Bouwer, M., de Jong, K., Jonk, M., Berman, T., Bersani, R., Lusser, H., Nissinen, A., Parikka, K., & Szuppinger, P. (2006). Green public procurement in Europe 2006: Conclusions and recommendations. European Commission. Bratt, C. (2011). Assessment of eco-labelling and green procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective [Doctoral dissertation, Blekinge Institute of Technology]. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387. Chen, J., & Hu, Y. (2020). The role of e-procurement in mitigating information asymmetry: Evidence from Chinese construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(7), 485–497. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers. Heckmann, I., Comes, T., Nickel, S., & Garcia-Herreros, P. (2019). Contingency theory of technology adoption in supply chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 40(1), 1–20. Idowu, A. O., Afolabi, A. O., & Oke, A. O. (2020). An empirical analysis of the adoption of digital technologies in supply chain management in Nigeria. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(2), 282–304. Kim, Y., Lacity, M. C., & Vician, C. (2020). The impact of blockchain on businesses: A systematic review. Decision Support Systems, 140, 113343. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. Kumar, S., Luthra, S., Haleem, A., Mangla, S. K., & Barua, M. K. (2021). A conceptual framework for the adoption of artificial intelligence in supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(2), 569–587. Mugera, A. G., & Iddrisu, A. (2019). Adoption and impact of e-procurement on supply chain performance in the public sector. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(4), 677–704. Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Environmental sustainability and technology in supply chain management: A research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 199, 43–51. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technological innovation. Lexington Books. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.