Submit your papers Submit Now
International Peer-Reviewed Journal
For Enquiries: editor@iiardjournals.org
📄 Download Paper

Determination of Voltage and Current Generation of E. Coli Isolated from Wound, Urine, and Water Samples

Imrana Adamu Musa; Mohammed Ali Yobi

Abstract

The increasing global demand for sustainable energy accelerates the development of microbial fuel cells (MFCs), which utilize bacterial metabolism to generate electricity. This study addresses a critical gap in this field by investigating how the native environment of Escherichia coli influences its electrogenic potential. The research therefore aims to evaluate and contrast the bioelectricity generation of E. coli isolates sourced from wound, urine, and water samples. Guided by the theoretical framework of extracellular electron transfer, which posits that a bacterium's metabolic adaptations to its habitat directly impact its electron-shuttling efficiency, the study employs a standardized dual-chamber MFC. Isolates are cultured and identified using established microbiological techniques before being introduced into the MFC, which is equipped with a carbon paper anode and a Nafion®117 proton exchange membrane. Voltage and current outputs are meticulously recorded over a seven-day period. The results demonstrates that all E. coli isolates are capable of producing electricity, but their performance varies significantly based on their origin. The urine-derived isolate yields the highest and most stable output, peaking at 2.53 V and 1.27 A. The wound isolate shows a consistent increase, reaching 1.93 V and 0.67 A, while the water isolate produces the lowest and most declining output, with a maximum of 1.42 V and 0.39 A. The study concludes that the source of an E. coli isolate is a decisive factor in its electrogenic performance, with strains from nutrient-rich environments like urine holding the greatest promise. It is recommended that future MFC research prioritizes the selection of bacterial inocula based on their ecological background and explores the specific genetic and metabolic mechanisms underpinning these performance differences to optimize bioenergy systems.

Keywords

E. coli bacteria electrogenic and microbial fuel cells

References

Adekunle, T., Sharma, P., & Lee, S. (2020). Current generation by E. coli isolates from water sources in microbial fuel cells. Renewable Microbial Energy, 8(2), 67–75. Ali, F., Hassan, A., & Kumar, R. (2020). Urine as a sustainable substrate for microbial fuel cells. Environmental Biotechnology, 11(4), 210–219. Bhupendra, V. S., Patel, R., & Mehta, M. (2022). Microbial biotechnology: Applications and advancements. Journal of Applied Biotechnology Reports, 9(4), 25–35. Croxen, M. A., et al. (2022). Molecular mechanisms of Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 20(5), 235-250. Gordi, J. M. (2012). Microbial fuel cell performance: Design, operation and biological factors (pp. 1– 242). Hassan, S., Nandy, S., & Tripathi, A. (2021). Substrate effects on microbial fuel cell performance: A comparative study. Journal of Bioelectrochemistry, 19(2), 87–98. Jang, J., Hur, H. G., Sadowsky, M. J., Byappanahalli, M. N., Yan, T., & Ishii, S. (2017). Environmental Escherichia coli: Ecology and public health implications—A review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 123(3), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13468 Jia, J., Tang, Y., Liu, B., Wu, D., Ren, N., & Xing, D. (2013). Electricity generation from food wastes and microbial community structure in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology, 144, 94–99. Koch, C., & Harnisch, F. (2022). What is the essence of microbial electroactivity? Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 869-783. Kumar, R., Singh, L., Zularisam, A. W., Hai, F. I., and Al-Muhtaseb, A. H. (2021). Microbial fuel cells: Types, designs and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 148, 111257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111257 Kumar, R., Sharma, P., & Singh, S. (2021). Comparative analysis of bacterial isolates for electricity generation in microbial fuel cells. Journal of Environmental Biotechnology Research, 10(2), 45–56. Li, Y., Wang, X., & Feng, Y. (2023). Scaling up microbial fuel cells: Configuration, challenges, and future perspectives. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 57 , Logan, B. E. (2008). Microbial fuel cells: Bioelectrochemical systems for renewable energy generation. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(23), 8593–8600. Lovley, D. R. (2012). Electrogenic microorganisms—A new source of renewable energy. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 10(6), 455–460. Mitchell, P. (1961). Coupling of phosphorylation to electron and hydrogen transfer by a chemi- osmotic type of mechanism. Nature, 191, 144–148. Muazu, U., & Aliyu-paiko, M. (2020). Evaluating the potentials of Carica papaya seed as phytobiotic to improve feed efficiency, growth performance and serum biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. IOSR Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 6(1), 8–18. Nguyen, P., & Lee, S. (2019). Electrogenic activity of E. coli from aquatic environments. Water Research and Biotechnology, 7(4), 212–223. Ojo, A., Sharma, P., & Singh, R. (2020). Biochemical identification and electrogenic potential of clinical bacterial isolates. Journal of Applied Microbiology and Bioenergy, 13(2), 78–90. Oluwafemi, O. P., Adegboye, A. O., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2022). Bioelectric properties of Escherichia coli isolated from clinical samples using microbial fuel cells. African Journal of Microbial Energy Studies, 7(1), 33–44. Patel, S., & Verma, M. L. (2023). Harnessing microbial communities from complex waste streams for enhanced energy recovery in bio-electrochemical systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 187 , 113741. Pinu, F. R., Granucci, N., Daniell, J., Li, T., Sonia, H., Isabel, C., & Jens, R. (2018). Metabolite secretion in microorganisms: The theory of metabolic overflow put to the test. Metabolomics, 14(43), 1–16. Sharma, P., & Kumar, S. (2024). Metabolomic adaptations of wastewater-derived Bacillus species and their correlation with enhanced power output in microbial fuel cells. Science of the Total Environment, 906, 167782. Sharma, S., Kumar, R., & Zhang, X. (2022). Voltage and current generation by wound-derived E. coli isolates in MFCs. Journal of Microbial Technology, 20(3), 112–125. Sharma, V., Saxena, S., & Yadav, R. (2022). Microorganisms: Diversity, functions, and biotechnological applications. Microbial Biotechnology Letters, 18(3), 45–54. Singh, D., Pratap, D., Baranwal, Y., Kumar, B., & Chaudhary, R. K. (2010). Microbial fuel cells: A green technology for power generation. Annals of Biological Research, 1(3), 128–138. Singh, R., Kumar, M., Mittal, A., & Mehta, P. K. (2017). Microbial metabolites in nutrition, healthcare and agriculture. 3 Biotech, 7(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016- 0586-4 Soni, R., et al. (2022). Biodiversity and applications of microorganisms. In Microbial Diversity and Biotechnology. Springer, Singapore. Stephanie, T. (2018). Microbes and their importance. Microbiology Today, 45(2), 78–83. Stephen, A., & Joseph, B. (2013). Fecal coliforms and water quality indicators: A critical review. Journal of Water and Health, 11(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2013.008 Yaqoob, A. A., et al. (2023). Microbial fuel cells: A comprehensive review of principles and applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 135-152. Zhang, X., Ali, F., & Adeyemo, O. (2019). Electrogenic performance of clinical vs environmental isolates in microbial fuel cells. Renewable Microbial Energy, 9(1), 29– Zhang, Y., & Li, B. (2024). Engineering Escherichia coli for enhanced extracellular electron transfer: A review of synthetic biology approaches. Biotechnology Advances, 72, Zinnah, M. A., Bari, S. M. N., Islam, M. T., Uddin, M. J., & Rahman, M. M. (2007). Characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from poultry and human. Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 5(1–2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjvm.v5i1.1335