RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PURE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (RJPST )
E-ISSN 2579-0536
P-ISSN 2695-2696
VOL. 8 NO. 5 2025
DOI: 10.56201/rjpst.vol.8.no5.2025.pg77.84
Orumu S.T., Damini Righteous Gilbert, and John A.T.
This experimental study investigates the influence of length-to-depth (L/D) ratio on the axial load capacity and failure behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) square columns constructed with varying concrete grades (M15, M20, and M25). A total of 54 column specimens were tested under axial compression, each with a constant cross-section of 100 mm × 100 mm, a fixed reinforcement ratio of 2.8%, and varying L/D ratios ranging from 1 to 10. The results revealed a strong inverse relationship between L/D ratio and axial load capacity across all concrete grades. Columns with lower L/D ratios exhibited significantly higher axial load capacities due to their reduced susceptibility to buckling, with specimens at L/D = 1 demonstrating up to a 293% increase in axial load capacity compared to those at L/D = 10. Additionally, the concrete grade had a pronounced effect on axial performance: at an L/D ratio of 1, M25-grade columns (RC-A1-25) achieved axial loads 10.2% and 26.4% higher than M20 (RC-A2-20) and M15 (RC-A3-15) grades, respectively. At the slenderest ratio (L/D = 10), M25 columns maintained capacities 11.1% and 22.8% greater than M20 and M15 columns. Failure modes were strongly influenced by slenderness; slender columns (L/D ? 9) predominantly failed by buckling, while shorter columns (L/D ? 7) exhibited crushing failure. These findings highlight the critical importance of both L/D ratio and concrete strength in optimizing the structural design and axial load capacity of reinforced concrete columns.
Concrete Grade, Columns, Length-to-Depth Ratio, Failure Modes, Axial load
Acun, B., & Sucuoglu, H. (2010). An analytical model for the axial behavior of rectangular RC
columns
under
cyclic
loading.
Engineering
Structures,
32(3),
748–760.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.009
ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19).
American Concrete Institute.
BS EN 1992-1-1:2004. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and
Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization.
Callister, W. D., & Rethwisch, D. G. (2018). Materials science and engineering: An introduction
(10th ed.). Wiley.
IS 10262:2019. (2019). Concrete Mix Proportioning – Guidelines. Bureau of Indian Standards.
IS 456:2000. (2000). Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian
Standards.
Isleem, H. F., Hilo, S. J., & Al-Zien, Y. A. (2021). Axial load behavior of high-strength concrete
columns
confined
with
CFRP
composites.
Structures,
32,
1160–1173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.061
MacGregor, J. G., & Wight, J. K. (2012). Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design (6th ed.).
Pearson Education.
Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials.
McGraw-Hill Education.
Mendis, P., Ngo, T., Haritos, N., Hira, A., Samali, B., & Gallant, B. (2007). Design of high-
strength concrete columns. Concrete Institute of Australia.
Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of Concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Nilson, A. H., Darwin, D., & Dolan, C. W. (2010). Design of concrete structures (14th ed.).
McGraw-Hill.
Nilson, A. H., Darwin, D., & Dolan, C. W. (2010). Design of Concrete Structures. McGraw-Hill
Education.
Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. Wiley.
Salah-Eldin, A. M., & Benmokrane, B. (2020). "Behavior of RC Columns Reinforced with GFRP
Bars under Axial Load." Journal of Composites for Construction, 24(2), 04020001.
Shetty, M. S. (2005). Concrete Technology: Theory and Practice. S. Chand Publishing.
Wang, C. K., Salmon, C. G., & Pincheira, J. A. (2018). Reinforced Concrete Design. Wiley.