RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PURE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (RJPST )

E-ISSN 2579-0536
P-ISSN 2695-2696
VOL. 8 NO. 5 2025
DOI: 10.56201/rjpst.vol.8.no5.2025.pg77.84


Experimental Study on the Influence of Length-to-Depth Ratio on the Axial Load Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Square Columns at Varying Concrete Grades

Orumu S.T., Damini Righteous Gilbert, and John A.T.


Abstract


This experimental study investigates the influence of length-to-depth (L/D) ratio on the axial load capacity and failure behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) square columns constructed with varying concrete grades (M15, M20, and M25). A total of 54 column specimens were tested under axial compression, each with a constant cross-section of 100 mm × 100 mm, a fixed reinforcement ratio of 2.8%, and varying L/D ratios ranging from 1 to 10. The results revealed a strong inverse relationship between L/D ratio and axial load capacity across all concrete grades. Columns with lower L/D ratios exhibited significantly higher axial load capacities due to their reduced susceptibility to buckling, with specimens at L/D = 1 demonstrating up to a 293% increase in axial load capacity compared to those at L/D = 10. Additionally, the concrete grade had a pronounced effect on axial performance: at an L/D ratio of 1, M25-grade columns (RC-A1-25) achieved axial loads 10.2% and 26.4% higher than M20 (RC-A2-20) and M15 (RC-A3-15) grades, respectively. At the slenderest ratio (L/D = 10), M25 columns maintained capacities 11.1% and 22.8% greater than M20 and M15 columns. Failure modes were strongly influenced by slenderness; slender columns (L/D ? 9) predominantly failed by buckling, while shorter columns (L/D ? 7) exhibited crushing failure. These findings highlight the critical importance of both L/D ratio and concrete strength in optimizing the structural design and axial load capacity of reinforced concrete columns.


keywords:

Concrete Grade, Columns, Length-to-Depth Ratio, Failure Modes, Axial load


References:


Acun, B., & Sucuoglu, H. (2010). An analytical model for the axial behavior of rectangular RC
columns
under
cyclic
loading.
Engineering
Structures,
32(3),
748–760.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.009
ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19).
American Concrete Institute.
BS EN 1992-1-1:2004. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and
Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization.
Callister, W. D., & Rethwisch, D. G. (2018). Materials science and engineering: An introduction
(10th ed.). Wiley.
IS 10262:2019. (2019). Concrete Mix Proportioning – Guidelines. Bureau of Indian Standards.
IS 456:2000. (2000). Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian
Standards.
Isleem, H. F., Hilo, S. J., & Al-Zien, Y. A. (2021). Axial load behavior of high-strength concrete
columns
confined
with
CFRP
composites.
Structures,
32,
1160–1173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.061
MacGregor, J. G., & Wight, J. K. (2012). Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design (6th ed.).
Pearson Education.
Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials.
McGraw-Hill Education.
Mendis, P., Ngo, T., Haritos, N., Hira, A., Samali, B., & Gallant, B. (2007). Design of high-
strength concrete columns. Concrete Institute of Australia.
Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of Concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Nilson, A. H., Darwin, D., & Dolan, C. W. (2010). Design of concrete structures (14th ed.).
McGraw-Hill.
Nilson, A. H., Darwin, D., & Dolan, C. W. (2010). Design of Concrete Structures. McGraw-Hill
Education.
Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. Wiley.
Salah-Eldin, A. M., & Benmokrane, B. (2020). "Behavior of RC Columns Reinforced with GFRP
Bars under Axial Load." Journal of Composites for Construction, 24(2), 04020001.
Shetty, M. S. (2005). Concrete Technology: Theory and Practice. S. Chand Publishing.
Wang, C. K., Salmon, C. G., & Pincheira, J. A. (2018). Reinforced Concrete Design. Wiley.


DOWNLOAD PDF

Back


Google Scholar logo
Crossref logo
ResearchGate logo
Open Access logo
Google logo